Popular Misconception About Offshore Software Development

In recent years, the popularity of remote teams and offshore software development has grown significantly. The onset of the epidemic promoted virtual business. Working with globally dispersed teams is no longer the myth that it once was. The ability to access a large talent pool without regard to location is made possible for many firms by having a solid remote staff.

The idea of offshore software development has lost trust despite its popularity and benefits. In order to clear up some common misconceptions concerning offshore software development, let us delve deeper:

A. Quality Is Subpar:

Due to the fact that offshore development teams are less expensive than internal teams, many businesses have long held the belief that cheap implies low quality. Hiring offshore developers was not a wise decision in some cases because some offshore teams supplied subpar services. Evidently, this can occur if your company partners with a bad offshore company. Numerous well-known outsourcing locations, like the Philippines, India, and Vietnam, among others, annually create thousands of IT specialists. The technical workforce in each nation has been upgrading their skills to gain an advantage in the global tech business and deliver high-quality results. Another crucial aspect is that inefficient use of time can result in subpar results. Due to time restrictions, quality may suffer when some businesses outsource in order to fulfill their deadlines. To prevent this from happening to you, look for a reputable offshore partner who offers affordable costs and a strong portfolio of clients.

B. Cost Control:

The offshore business quickly caught on to the cheap software fad and became quite adept at undercutting one another by locating incredibly inexpensive and, thus, low-quality developers. But while choosing an offshore partner, businesses neglected to take into account the fact that “cheap” and “cheaper” signify two quite different things. The contract should include financial transparency so that you have something to show for it.

C. Communication Barrier:

The cultural and linguistic barrier is widely mentioned as one of the key drawbacks of employing developers offshore. It is assumed that the differences in language, culture, and behavior can lead to miscommunication and delays on both sides because the majority of popular outsourcing destinations are non-English speaking nations. Let’s examine the facts: India has more than 125 million native English speakers, making it the second-largest English-speaking nation in the world. It is predicted to increase fourfold during the following ten years. The Philippines is one of the top English-speaking nations, according to the 2017 EF English Proficiency Index. The days of geographic distance affecting companies using remote teams are long gone. After the pandemic, a variety of contemporary communication techniques have made international communication (particularly in a professional, task-oriented setting) simple. The alternatives are limitless and include instant messaging, video calls, emails, time management tools, online meetings, global chat rooms, and project management tools.

Coding Collective

D. Productivity Lag:

To prevent the bother and inconvenience caused by the time difference, businesses avoid outsourcing. However, the majority of offshore developers work in the same time zone as their clients, making things simple for everyone involved. Bridging the cultural gap is typically one of the top issues that organizations in the West experience with offshore software development teams. A hundred distinct myths might be spawned by the stigma surrounding the working conditions and cultures of offshore nations. The world is more versatile than we realize. The blending and circulation of socio-cultural customs have been increased by globalization. We all enjoy the same movies, dress alike, and aspire to have the newest technology. To put it another way, there are more similarities than differences, and a lot depends on what we choose to emphasize. You simply need to locate a service that offers the ideal setup based on your needs for your company.

E. Project Control:

Many organizations believe they won’t be able to adequately control or monitor their offshore developers because operations and development take place abroad. Because of this, they view outsourcing as a risky corporate choice that, if improperly handled, might spiral out of control. Working with an on-site or an offshore team these days hardly makes a difference thanks to the accessibility and availability of numerous project management software. Businesses and remote teams can interact and cooperate with ease thanks to online project management tools and communication apps. Additionally, many organizations worry that outsourcing companies would misuse their data or have inadequate cybersecurity safeguards when they trust a third party to manage their operations and data. Businesses have reason to be worried about this. Despite the fact that this is a serious worry, you should be aware that offshore providers adhere to common security measures based on the client’s company policies and the national laws of the outsourced organization. To protect their client’s data from attacks, reputable offshore companies typically use the newest security software.

F. Only Big Business Can Afford It:

Google and IBM are well-known for large-scale outsourcing of development and back-office functions. Large organizations have a distinct advantage when they hire developers abroad since they can expand their operations without incurring excessive costs. Due to this need, the majority of outsourcing businesses often exclusively serve large IT companies. Some offshore service providers also work with small enterprises, despite the fact that they primarily serve larger corporations. In fact, small and medium-sized businesses are the biggest users of IT outsourcing (SMEs). Since these SMEs are more likely to become long-term partners, offshore businesses likewise adore working with them.

Coding Collective

G. Offshoring Is Only Good Short-Term:

The majority of services provided by outsourcing are non-value-added jobs and consultation services. Additionally, the bulk of companies just outsources to cover a role for brief projects. Businesses believe that outsourcing is only suitable for short-term strategies due to its services and project duration. Actually, long-term outsourcing is a wise corporate investment. Clients who outsource a project or job get a valuable business partner in addition to ongoing cost savings. The more time you spend working with offshore providers, the more they can learn about your organization’s objectives and operating procedures and come up with business solutions that are more effective for you. Offshore providers are qualified to do this. You can improve procedures and create better products or services with the assistance of your offshore partner. When you work with an offshore provider, you have a competent strategic business partner who is prepared to address your demands for IT outsourcing.

H. Ethical Concerns Of Hiring Offshore Development Team

The simplest approach to handle your concerns about the ethics and morality of working with offshore teams is to talk to your local employees about it. If you don’t discuss it with your staff, they might question if the offshore team will ultimately replace them, and rumors might start to circulate. Instead, be truthful. Make sure your local staff is informed of your company’s long-term goals, the duties assigned to your offshore team, and the implications for each person involved with the development process. You won’t have to deal with any long-term ethical repercussions if you do it this way.

Quality is a typical issue that pertains to the morality of offshore. Some businesses continue to have doubts about the caliber of software developments created by programmers in nations such as India and the Philippines. The truth, however, is far different. India is the world’s leading producer of engineers, producing about 1.5 million of them each year. This makes it much simpler to identify talented, committed, and motivated engineers. They only offer the greatest software because of their superior training, can-do attitude, and grasping skills. Another issue is the working conditions. The salaries of engineers in nations like India are a topic for further ethical debates offshore. Businesses occasionally worry that perhaps engineers aren’t being paid enough since they are either not as good or the quality of work performed is subpar because you can recruit software developers at much lower compensations. However, India’s lower cost of living is the main factor for their payroll being substantially lower. For instance, the difference between consumer costs between India and the UK is over 219 percent. Even groceries cost 124 percent more in the UK than they do in India. Therefore, even if an offshore software development firm in India can pay developers anywhere from 25 to 40 euros per hour, their available cash is still quite high.

This indicates that they are fairly compensated and that companies are not using lower-quality labor by using cheaper labor. You may get developers who offer value to your organization without breaking the bank by working with the proper offshore development company.